Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • Manuscripts have never been published elsewhere or submitted simultaneously to any other publisher.
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format according to template. Submissions in other formats will be automatically rejected
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided, and the manuscript has used the Reference management tool
  • Manuscripts have been prepared in accordance with the templates and guidelines that have been determined.
  • In the case of submitted-manuscript withdrawal due to the author(s) request, then the author agrees to accept the consequences in accordance with journal policy.
  • The authors agree to upload their manuscripts to preprint sites as long as the manuscript is still in the peer review process
  • Copyright of this article is belong to you author(s), The authors state that the manuscripts they submit are free from potential plagiarism in any form and do not violate the copyright of any party.
  • The authors agree to follow the flow of the EIJA publishing process properly and are willing to provide the revised results as soon as possible
  • You agree that the editor has the right to make improvements to the writing format (not the content) without reducing the substance of your article
  • the manuscript that I/we submit is my/our original manuscript and has never been published anywhere before

Author Guidelines

Titles: Title of articles, written in Bilingual (Indonesia and English), maximum of 20 words and should clearly describe the article content, written in sentence cases written in Cambria 16pt.

Author(s)name: written in sentences cases, without any academic degree written in Cambria 11 pt
affiliation; written in Cambria 11 pt, with department name, faculty, university or institution, city, country, and an active email.

Abstract; written in bilingual (Indonesian and English). Abstract consisting of one paragraph, the number of words between 75-250 words. Abstracts should contain a short and precise introduction, methods, results and discussion, and conclusions. Unless the articles in the form of studies or reviews can be adjusted. The abstract does not contain a description of mathematical and statistical language or any references; it does not contain quotes, do not use abbreviations

Keywords: Keywords representing a maximum of 5 words that describe the best about the research content; please do not use a common word or location name as keywords—keyword writing in Cambria font 11 pt.

Article bodies: consist of introduction, methods, result and discussion and conclusion section. It is all written in Cambria 11pt with a single space.

The manuscript is written in English or Indonesian with a permissible number of characters between 4000 and 7000 words.

The manuscript compiled on A4 paper format with two (2) columns and a margin of 2 cm on the right side, top, bottom, and 3 cm on the left side (for more convenience please use the provided template)

Introduction: The Introduction is preceded (short, for example, a maximum of 1 paragraph) background behind the general study; then supposed to load State of The Art (literature review or research two previously briefly, 1-2 paragraphs) to justify/strengthen the statement novelty or significance or contribution scientific or originality of your article (Yin et al., 2011). Try to reference articles from journals of the last ten years that reinforce the justification of originality or these contributions (Rizqiyah, 2016). Before writing the study objectives, you must there is a Gap Analysis or statement gap (originality) or novelty statement) clearly and explicitly, or this research's unique difference compared previous studies, too of the importance of this research done; then write it down research objectives straightforward and unambiguous (Berke et al., 2006), NOT like this(Based on this background, hence the purpose of this research ....)

Methods: Write down research procedures complete in this section. Write down all information such as design, participants, instruments, data analysis, usage database, application software, etc. According to that research, it can be written in paragraphs or from others (Ekomadyo et al., 2018). In principle, this section is made as informative as possible so the method can be quickly and followed by other researchers. Part of this method is optional and cannot be displayed according to the type of article, for example, book reviews, editorial letters, etc. (Turner, 1976)

Results and discussions Contain research findings that are results, and the discussion is not carried out separately. The hope is in the discussion this time; the authors reviewed the findings and cross-reference with theoretical and empirical studies. They were written for systematic, critical analysis and information (Firzal, 2002).

Use of tables, figures etc., only to support clarifying the discussion and is limited to genuinely substantial supporters, e.g., statistical table of results testing, drawing models, sketches, results are testing, and so on. Discussion results to be argumentative about the relevance of results, theories, previous research, and empirical facts found and show novelty findings. The tables' use is highly recommendednot very long, and if necessaryenter a long table is then created in the Appendix or Appendix. Example presentation of tables and pictures/graphs In the results and discussion section at least contains: what / how elements, whether the data presented has been processed (not raw data), Showed in the table or figure form (choose one of them), and given a straightforward explanation understood. The discussion must be made supported by real and apparent facts and contains elements of what else, is there compatibility or contradiction with other people's research results?

sample of table

sample of picture

Conclusion: This section contains its conclusions written in a single paragraph or two. The conclusion is written in the form of an essay, not numeric. Conclusions must answer the research question and did not described in statistical sentences. If need to write down suggestions or recommendations, anything should be written together in the second paragraph

disclosure statement This section contains the authors' statements regarding their release from various potential conflicts that may arise. In this section, the authors can also include sources of research funding

Acknowledgment In this section, the author can include various parties (individuals or institutions) that essentially support the research process.

References : EMARA journal references written using the APA format (AmericanPsychological Association) 7th Edition (recent Edition). Reference writing MANDATORY uses the application reference manager such as Mendeley, EndNote, Zotero, or others. It is important to use references from the publication of scientific articles published ten last year, by number at least 70-80 percent of total overall references are used. Here are a few examples of reference writing

Journal article
Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Municipal Performance: Does Mayoral Quality Matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 285–312.

Irazábal, C. (2017). City Making and Urban Governance in the Americas: Curitiba and Portland. Routledge.

Firzal, Y. (2002). Arahan rancanganmenjaga karakter visual kawasan:Studi kasus Jalan Asia Afrika,Bandung [Master Theses,Universitas Gadjah Mada].

Ekomadyo, A. S., Santri, T., & Riyadi, A.(2018). Habitat for InnovativeMilieu: A Place-Making Study ofUniversity and Start-upEnterprises Relationship. IOPConference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 152,012020.

Aziz, A. (2011, July 16). Peranan Ulama Dalam Transformasi Sosial Budaya Menuju Masyarakat Madani. Retrieved 3 October 2018, from Grinting Community website:



The following are some guidelines for a book review essay. Your book review should concern only the book(s) that you’re reviewing with a word count of about 1,500 words (including the references). It should provide EIJA readers an engaging, informative and critical discussion of the work. The review should also consider:

The intended audience for the book and those who would find it useful
The main objectives of the book and how effectively these are accomplished
The context or impetus for the book (e.g., design controversy, review research, policy, theory, etc.)
A comparison of other works on this subject
Constructive comments about the strengths and weaknesses of the book

Please lead your essay with the following listing:

Author(s) or editor(s) first and last name(s) and please indicate if it is an edited book
Title of book
Publisher's city and state and name of publisher
Year of publication
Price (please indicate paperback or hard cover)
Total # of page expressed as XXX pp.
Image of the book cover


Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.